ENDE

Account

Analytics 1Cases 1Decisions 4Judges 5Parties 2Firms

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

inadmissibility of late new arguments under rule 9.2 rop even on the same broad issue

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filters

Case number

Patent number

Filing date

→

Decision date

→

Division

Language

Category

Subcategory

Substantive (main) cases only

Proceeding type

Action type

Status

Outcome

Outcome detail

Motion type

Settlement timing

Technology (L1)

Technology sector

CPC code

SEP / FRAND

Judge

Claimant

Respondent

Firm

Corporate group

Entity type

Has security order

Security status

Legal principle

inadmissibility of late new arguments under rule 9.2 rop even on the same broad issue

Cites UPC case

Cites authority

Had oral hearing

Filing trends Outcomes Pendency Technology Forum strategy Leading cases Legal issues Security for costs

Leading cases

The most-cited UPC decisions, organized by legal point. The precedent backbone of UPC case law.

Westlaw-style precedent index for the UPC. 50 most-cited cases extracted from 0 decisions (2,892 citations).

All By legal point External authorities

Legal principleinadmissibility of late new arguments under rule 9.2 rop even on the same broad issue Clear all

#	Authority	Court	Times cited
1	9.2	Rules of Procedure	1
2	73	EPC article	1
3	220.1	Rules of Procedure	1
4	82	EPC article	1