UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions0Judges3Parties1Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

CategoryinfringementLegal principledoctrine of equivalents (four-question test under art. 69 epc protocol)Clear all

Filtering to principle: doctrine of equivalents (four-question test under art. 69 epc protocol)

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
doctrine of equivalents (four-question test under art. 69 epc protocol)11100%
two-step infringement analysis: literal then equivalence11100%
validity and infringement by equivalence assessed together11100%
court-ordered recall letter and website publication under art. 64 upca11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
counterclaim for revocation of ep 2 137 782 should succeedRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.