Legal issues
Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
| Argument | Party | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| valeo lacks entitlement to bring pi proceedings / patent title is manifestly erroneous | Respondent | 1 |
| general revocation rates of patents indicate the patent is more likely than not invalid | Respondent | 1 |
| infringement is established: the accused occlusion devices fall within the scope of ep 1 998 686 b2 | Claimant | 1 |
| application dismissed in all other aspects against defendant 1 | Claimant | 1 |
| remaining aspects of application (not specified in available excerpt) | Claimant | 1 |
| market saturation from infringing products and long-term customer lock-in create irreparable harm justifying provisional measures | Claimant | 1 |
| ongoing tenders in italy creating long-term binding commitments justify urgent provisional measures | Claimant | 1 |
| applicant acted in bad faith by unlawfully appropriating the patent, warranting denial of pi | Respondent | 1 |
| application for rectification: '2 series gran coupé' model omitted from bmw exception list by obvious slip | Respondent | 1 |
| review of allocation of technically qualified judge to obtain one with mechanical engineering expertise | Respondent | 1 |
| security for costs should be ordered against 10x genomics in the provisional measures proceedings | Respondent | 1 |
| rectification of injunction order to include austria in the territorial scope | Claimant | 1 |
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
No prior-art data in the current scope.