UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges2Parties2Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Categoryprovisional_measuresLegal principleinfringement must be established before validity and other pi requirements are assessedClear all

Filtering to principle: infringement must be established before validity and other pi requirements are assessed

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
burden of proof for infringement lies with applicant110%
reversal of burden of proof requires reasonable prior indications of infringement110%
infringement must be established before validity and other pi requirements are assessed110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
attacked embodiment (speed care hemostatic gauze) contains a binder as required by patent claimsClaimant1
burden of proof should be reversed because applicant has provided reasonable indications of infringementClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.