UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions3Judges3Parties5Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

CategoryrevocationLegal principlemotivation to combine prior art references required for obviousnessClear all

Filtering to principle: motivation to combine prior art references required for obviousness

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
problem-solution approach for inventive step11100%
standstill clause breach does not bar action but may give rise to contractual liability11100%
motivation to combine prior art references required for obviousness11100%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
lack of inventive step over diaz combined with robertsonClaimant1
lack of inventive step starting from glejboel combined with diaz and/or robertsonClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
ReferencePredominant roleCases
Diaz (unspecified publication, liquid drug delivery system)Obviousness combination1
Robertson (unspecified publication, container for solid medicaments)Obviousness combination1
Glejboel (unspecified publication)Obviousness combination1