Legal issues
Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
| Argument | Party | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| patent as granted is valid and infringed by xiaomi's wireless charging products | Claimant | 1 |
| number of auxiliary requests is unduly burdensome on defendants | Respondent | 1 |
| connected ball technology infringes the patent by using sensor data to determine ball contact | Claimant | 1 |
| infringement by equivalents — accelerometer processing equivalent to sound-signal comparison | Claimant | 1 |
| auxiliary requests based on amended claims (adding acceleration sensing) establish infringement | Claimant | 1 |
| security/enforcement bond should be ordered against occlutech | Respondent | 1 |
| information order extending to prices and numbers of cabinets sold (for damages calculation) | Claimant | 1 |
| barco's delay in filing was not unreasonable given complexity of infringement analysis | Claimant | 1 |
| rectification of final order to add the word 'interim' to costs award was warranted under r. 353 rop | Claimant | 1 |
| literal infringement of the patent on the medical device (sleep apnea treatment) by orthoapnea and vivisol products | Claimant | 1 |
| infringement by equivalence of the same patent claims | Claimant | 1 |
| bioo products do not literally infringe claim 11 of ep 2137782 | Respondent | 1 |
| counterclaim for revocation of ep 2137782 | Respondent | 1 |
| bioo ed and other products are not essential components for the patented method | Respondent | 1 |
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
No prior-art data in the current scope.