Legal issues
Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
| Argument | Party | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| accused test kits directly infringe claim 1 because the average normalization is mathematically identical to successive per-gene normalization | Claimant | 1 |
| indirect infringement: the test kit is suitable and intended for the patented method using oaz1 alone as reference gene | Claimant | 1 |
| genes calm2 and rpl37a can serve as further reference genes under the patent's multi-reference-gene reading | Claimant | 1 |
| english is the commonly used language in the relevant field of technology, justifying language change | Respondent | 1 |
| nvidia is significantly impaired in organising its defence in german | Respondent | 1 |
| exhaustion: defendants' filter cartridges are legitimately supplied replacement parts for products placed on market by brita | Respondent | 1 |
| patent claims as originally granted are valid (revocation counterclaim) | Respondent | 1 |
| where patentee defends only via auxiliary requests (amended claims), court must first consider whether original claims are partially invalid under art. 65(3) upca | Respondent | 1 |
| nst as a us-based npe should be ordered to provide eur 200,000 security for costs | Respondent | 1 |
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
No prior-art data in the current scope.