UPC Analytics
ENDE

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Filtering to principle: problem-solution approach for inventive step

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 2 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
lack of inventive step over diaz combined with robertsonClaimant1
lack of inventive step starting from glejboel combined with diaz and/or robertsonClaimant1
patent ep 2 548 648 is valid and infringement claims should be upheldClaimant1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
ReferencePredominant roleCases
Diaz (unspecified publication, liquid drug delivery system)Obviousness combination1
Robertson (unspecified publication, container for solid medicaments)Obviousness combination1
Glejboel (unspecified publication)Obviousness combination1
D3 (unspecified publication, shredder/mill technology)Obviousness combination1
D9 (unspecified publication, fibrous wood material grinding with oblique ribs/strips)Obviousness combination1