UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties3Firms
Filing trendsOutcomesPendencyTechnologyForum strategyLeading casesLegal issuesSecurity for costs

Legal issues

Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.

Legal principlecosts split proportionally where each party partially succeedsClear all

Filtering to principle: costs split proportionally where each party partially succeeds

Clear principle filter
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 1 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
PrincipleCasesDecidedPatentee success
priority: 'same invention' standard under art. 87 epc equated to added matter disclosure standard110%
inventive step: material selection from limited class of known materials not inventive110%
equivalence assessment in infringement110%
partial revocation of patent on counterclaim110%
costs split proportionally where each party partially succeeds110%
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
ArgumentPartyCases
infringement of ep 2 755 901 b1 and/or ep 3 466 498 by defendants' egg packaging productsClaimant1
counterclaim for revocation dismissed in remaining parts beyond the partially revoked claimsRespondent1
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.

No prior-art data in the current scope.