Legal issues
Cross-cutting view of legal principles, recurring arguments, and the prior art the court relies on.
Most-litigated legal principles
Recurring legal principles across 2 cases with reasoning extracted. Success rate counts patentee-favorable outcomes only.
Most-rejected arguments
Arguments that the UPC has not accepted, ranked by repeat occurrences across cases.
| Argument | Party | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| attacked embodiment (speed care hemostatic gauze) contains a binder as required by patent claims | Claimant | 1 |
| burden of proof should be reversed because applicant has provided reasonable indications of infringement | Claimant | 1 |
| request for security for enforcement | Respondent | 1 |
| attacked embodiment contains only one fluid (a water-in-oil emulsion) preventing infringement | Respondent | 1 |
| cisco products implement the claimed dma-based simultaneous header-writing mechanism | Claimant | 1 |
| auxiliary requests establish infringement on alternative claim readings | Claimant | 1 |
| connected ball technology infringes the patent by using sensor data to determine ball contact | Claimant | 1 |
| infringement by equivalents — accelerometer processing equivalent to sound-signal comparison | Claimant | 1 |
| auxiliary requests based on amended claims (adding acceleration sensing) establish infringement | Claimant | 1 |
| security/enforcement bond should be ordered against occlutech | Respondent | 1 |
| application for provisional measures as to remaining embodiments (second group of attacked products) | Claimant | 1 |
| international jurisdiction for spanish national part of defendant 4 (dreame technology ab) | Claimant | 1 |
| inventive step attack based on documents already in the proceedings, raised for the first time at oral hearing | Respondent | 1 |
| counterclaim for revocation: ep 2 476 814 b1 is invalid | Respondent | 1 |
| preliminary injunction against samsung bioepis based on ep 3 167 888 b1 | Claimant | 1 |
| preliminary injunction against amgen entities based on ep 3 167 888 b1 | Claimant | 1 |
| tesla vehicles infringe ep 1612910 (on-board power supply monitor and power control system) | Claimant | 1 |
Most-cited prior art
References relied on across substantive merits cases, with the role they typically play.
No prior-art data in the current scope.