UPClytics
View all cases

APL 25922/2024

Case details
Status
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Thomas Gniadek (Simmons & Simmons)
Respondents
Reps: Jan Bösing (Bardehle Pagenberg); Saskia Mertsching (Bardehle Pagenberg); Monika Harten (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Language
First decided
Sep 17, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-09-17
    Appeal decisionAppeal RoP220.2

    The Court of Appeal set aside the Munich Local Division's orders refusing security for costs and ordered Network System Technologies LLC to provide security for costs to Volkswagen AG, finding that NST's financial position as a special-purpose patent enforcement entity created a legitimate concern that a cost order might not be recoverable.

    Legal issues:Security for costs (Art. 69(4) UPCA, R. 158 RoP)Burden of proof for security for costsFinancial position of special-purpose patent enforcement entityRelative financial position of parties irrelevant
Documents
  • 2C905323C8425B1AB8400716834F0CEE_en.pdf2024-09-17EN