UPClytics
View all cases

APL 588423/2023

EP3498115 +4 more · VAPORIZATION DEVICE SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Case details
Status
—
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
  • Other fields
    Other consumer goods
Language
—
First decided
Apr 3, 2024
EPO Opposition
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Klaus GrabinskiLocked
Judge Peter BlokLocked

At the UPC: Altria Group (45 cases)·Juul Labs Group (33 cases)

Related cases

This dispute contains 3 other proceedings

APL 588420/2023·APL 588422/2023·APL 588426/2023

15 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 328/2025·UPC CFI 298/2025·UPC CoA 237/2025·UPC CFI 135/2025·UPC CFI 129/2025 and 10 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2023

Decisions
  • 2024-04-03
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: Order by the Court of Appeal (Panel 1a, 3 April 2024) in five consolidated appeals (UPC_CoA_433-438/2023) upholding first-instance orders allowing NJOY Netherlands B.V. to rectify the name of the defendant in five revocation actions from Juul Labs, Inc. to Juul Labs International, Inc. (the registered patent proprietor). The CoA also clarified that costs are not awarded at appellate stage when the CoA decision does not conclude the action (R. 242.1 RoP).

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Rectification of party name (defendant)
    • No undue prejudice test
    • Costs at appellate stage (R. 242.1 RoP)
Documents
  • 954942145DB26409F7A88002BFA41610_en.pdf2024-04-03EN