APL 595643/2023

—

Case details: Status
—
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties: Claimants
Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.
Reps: Tobias J. Hessel (Clifford Chance); Lea Prehn (Clifford Chance); Thomas Misgaiski (Clifford Chance)
Respondents
Netgear Inc.
Netgear Deutschland GmbH
Netgear International Limited
Reps: Stephan Dorn (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Frank-Erich Hufnagel (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Division: Court of Appeal
Judges: —
Language: —
First decided: Mar 21, 2024

Decisions

2024-03-21
Appeal decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)
The Court of Appeal, on a request for discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP), ruled on the correct sequence of procedural remedies against decisions of the judge-rapporteur on preliminary objections, clarifying the relationship between panel review (R.333.1 RoP) and appeal. The review request was addressed on its merits under applicable procedural rules.
Legal issues:Discretionary review (R.220.3 RoP)Remedies against rapporteur's decisions on preliminary objectionsPanel review (R.333.1 RoP)Procedural interplay between panel review and appeal

Documents