UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_8639/2025

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealApplication to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)
Parties

Claimants

  • Tiroler Rohre GmbH
Reps: Florian Robl (Torggler Hofmann)

Respondents

  • SSAB Swedish Steel GmbH
  • SSAB Europe Oy
Reps: Not Specified (Not specified)
Judges
  • Not Specified (permanent Judge)Permanent Judge (Court of Appeal, R. 221.4 RoP)
Patents
Outcome
Costs only
Filed:
First decided: Jul 3, 2025
Language:

The Court of Appeal dismissed Tiroler Rohre GmbH's appeal against the first-instance costs decision following withdrawal of the infringement action, confirming the general applicability of R. 150 ff. RoP for cost assessment proceedings after withdrawal under R. 265 RoP. The court confirmed that cost assessment after action withdrawal follows the standard R. 150 ff. procedure and that the appeal review is marginal (limited to whether the awarded amount is unreasonable or contrary to Art. 69(1) UPCA). The costs award of EUR 84,033.76 to SSAB was upheld.