UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

APL_8790/2025

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealAppeal RoP220.2
Parties

Claimants

  • XSYS Italia S.r.l.
  • XSYS Prepress N.V.
  • XSYS Germany GmbH

Respondents

  • Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH
Judges
  • Klaus GrabinskiPresident of the Court of Appeal
  • Emmanuel GougéLegally qualified judge
  • Peter BlokLegally qualified judge
Patents
Outcome
Dismissed
Filed:
First decided: Jun 2, 2025
Language:

The Court of Appeal dismissed XSYS's appeal against rejection of a preliminary objection challenging the UPC's temporal competence in infringement proceedings brought by Esko-Graphics Imaging GmbH (UPC_CoA_156/2025). The Court established that the UPC has competence over acts of infringement occurring before the entry into force of the UPCA, as Art. 32 UPCA contains no temporal limitation. This does not violate the non-retroactivity principle under Art. 28 VCLT. During the transitional period, UPC and national courts have concurrent competence unless the patent is opted out. The Court also dismissed XSYS's request for a CJEU preliminary reference and for a stay of proceedings. In the case of an opt-out withdrawal, the UPC is competent also for acts occurring between the opt-out and withdrawal dates.