UPClytics
View all cases

APL 9578/2024

·EP3876490: METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR OVERLAYING MULTI-CARRIER AND DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNALS IN A BROADBAND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Case details
Status
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Constanze Krenz (DLA Piper); David Kleß (DLA Piper)
Respondents
Reps: Christoph Walke (Cohausz & Florack); Matthias Waters (Cohausz & Florack); Martin Rütten (Cohausz & Florack)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Jun 4, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-06-04
    DismissedAppeal decisionAppeal RoP220.2

    Court of Appeal (4 June 2024) rejected Neo Wireless's appeal and confirmed that the opt-out filed by Neo Wireless LLC (USA) for all EPC states was invalid because it was not filed on behalf of all proprietors of all national parts of the patent (Neo Wireless GmbH & Co. KG held the German part). Art. 83(3) UPCA requires all proprietors of all national parts to lodge or authorise an opt-out.

    Legal issues:Validity of opt-out (Art. 83(3) UPCA)Interpretation of opt-out requirementAll proprietors of all national parts must lodge opt-out
Documents
  • 5F9795874E86966B3D3A6B1A61BC2143_en.pdf2024-06-04ENGLISH