UPClytics
View all cases

ORD 23089/2024

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Case Management Orders
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Language
First decided
Apr 26, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-04-26
    Appeal decisionGeneric Order

    Court of Appeal (26 April 2024) ruled that AIM Sport Development AG was entitled to the longer appeal period under R. 224.1(a) RoP (2 months) rather than R. 220.1(c) (15 days) for lodging a statement of appeal, because the CFI incorrectly combined infringement and provisional measures proceedings in one decision without distinction, creating an excusable error on AIM's part.

    Legal issues:Time limit for lodging statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP)Excusable errorLegitimate expectationsMixed infringement/provisional measures decision
Documents
  • 590CA9ABC3E70E19CC4C2595624CE1BC_en.pdf2024-04-26ENGLISH