View all cases
ORD 23089/2024
—
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase Management Orders
- Parties
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- —
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 26, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-04-26Appeal decisionGeneric Order
Court of Appeal (26 April 2024) ruled that AIM Sport Development AG was entitled to the longer appeal period under R. 224.1(a) RoP (2 months) rather than R. 220.1(c) (15 days) for lodging a statement of appeal, because the CFI incorrectly combined infringement and provisional measures proceedings in one decision without distinction, creating an excusable error on AIM's part.
Legal issues:Time limit for lodging statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP)Excusable errorLegitimate expectationsMixed infringement/provisional measures decision
Documents
- 590CA9ABC3E70E19CC4C2595624CE1BC_en.pdf2024-04-26ENGLISH