PC-CoA-001/2025

The Court of Appeal denied the application by Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. (intervener/defendant) for suspensive effect of its appeal against the infringement order of the Vienna Local Division (15 January 2025) in proceedings between SWARCO FUTURIT and STRABAG. Chainzone failed to demonstrate manifest errors in the first-instance decision concerning EP 2 643 717 (a colour-mixing convergent optical system). The order confirming the injunction against STRABAG therefore remained enforceable. This is the German language version; an English translation exists (see finalorderuspensiveeffect EN.pdf). Note: the referenced case number in the parties section is UPC_CoA_70/2025 (Strabag appeal) and UPC_CoA_1/2025 (Chainzone appeal).

Court of Appeal order (SWARCO v STRABAG/Chainzone, registry ref PC-CoA-001/2025) denying Chainzone's application for suspensive effect of its appeal. A suspensive-effect denial is a procedural order, not a merits injunction ruling. Reassigned off the Harvard v Vizgen UPC_CoA_1/2025 via decision_case_overrides.json.