PC-CoA-001/2025
—·EP2643717: COLOR-MIXING CONVERGENT OPTICAL SYSTEM
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther Procedural
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- Alexander Koller-NOMOS Rechtsanwälte GmbH
RespondentsRepresentatives- Rainer Beetz-SONN Patentanwälte
- Katharina Pehle-Bird & Bird LLP
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Rian Kalden · Presiding judge and legally qualified judge
- Ingeborg Simonsson · Legally qualified judge
- Patricia Rombach · Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
- Anders Hansson · Technically qualified judge
- Klaus Loibner · Technically qualified judge
- Technology
- Display & Signage
- Language
- —
- First decided
- May 26, 2025
- 2025-05-26
Summary: The Court of Appeal denied the application by Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. (intervener/defendant) for suspensive effect of its appeal against the infringement order of the Vienna Local Division (15 January 2025) in proceedings between SWARCO FUTURIT and STRABAG. Chainzone failed to demonstrate manifest errors in the first-instance decision concerning EP 2 643 717 (a colour-mixing convergent optical system). The order confirming the injunction against STRABAG therefore remained enforceable. This is the German language version; an English translation exists (see finalorderuspensiveeffect EN.pdf). Note: the referenced case number in the parties section is UPC_CoA_70/2025 (Strabag appeal) and UPC_CoA_1/2025 (Chainzone appeal).
Show the legal issues (4)
- Application for suspensive effect under R.223 RoP
- Manifest error standard for suspensive effect
- Intermediary liability
- Security for enforcement under R.352.1 RoP
- finalordersuspensiveeffect.DE_.pdf2025-05-26DE
- finalorderuspensiveeffect%20EN.pdf2025-05-26EN