UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 16918/2025

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Not Specified
Respondents
Reps: Not Specified
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Language
First decided
Aug 14, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-08-14
    Generic application

    The Court of Appeal issued an order in Barco v. Yealink proceedings concerning an application for leave to change the claim (R. 263 RoP) and a request for further written pleadings (R. 36 RoP). The court denied leave to introduce a subsidiary claim that broadened the previous claim scope without justification for the late filing. The court also addressed the boundaries of permissible references to first-instance oral hearing statements on appeal.

    Legal issues:Leave to change claim on appeal (R. 263 RoP)Broadening of claims on appealExchange of further written pleadings on appeal (R. 36 RoP)Reference to first-instance oral hearing statements (R. 284 RoP)
Documents
  • 67AF2B50C94CAFBDE40611736BAB0A4F_en.pdf2025-08-14EN
Barco N.V. v Not fully identified (Yealink entities) — UPC APP 16918/2025 | UPClytics