UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 17551/2024

·EP3876490: METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR OVERLAYING MULTI-CARRIER AND DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNALS IN A BROADBAND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Constanze Krenz (DLA Piper); David Kleß (DLA Piper)
Respondents
Reps: Christoph Walke (Cohausz & Florack); Matthias Waters (Cohausz & Florack); Martin Rütten (Cohausz & Florack)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Apr 11, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-04-11
    Appeal decisionGeneric application

    Order of the Court of Appeal setting out the time period for filing a Statement of appeal under Rule 220.2 RoP where leave to appeal is granted in the impugned order itself. The Court held that the 15-day period runs from service of the order containing the grant of leave (whether in the impugned order itself or in a separate order). The appeal arises from Neo Wireless GmbH & Co KG challenging rejection of a preliminary objection in revocation proceedings concerning EP 3 876 490 brought by Toyota Motor Europe.

    Legal issues:Time period for Statement of appeal Rule 220.2 RoPLeave to appealPreliminary objection opt-out
Documents
  • 5634616C745F043FD28C30F13EE274F0_en.pdf2024-04-11EN