View all cases
UPC APP 25321/2025
EP4072364 Unitary patent +1 more · PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dainese S.p.A.Operating co.
Respondents- Alpinestars S.p.A.Operating co.
- Alpinestars Research S.p.A.Operating co.
- MOTOCARD BIKE, S.L.Operating co.
- Division
- Milan LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Other fieldsOther consumer goods
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 2, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2022-06-08
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2024-10-03
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Milan LD | Locked |
| Judge Alima Zana | Locked |
At the UPC: Dainese S.p.A. (17 cases)·Alpinestars S.p.A. (14 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
This dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 97/2026·UPC CFI 1781/2026·UPC CoA 931/2025·UPC CFI 182/2025·UPC CFI 831/2024 and 11 more
Decisions
- 2025-06-02
Summary: The Milan Local Division granted a joint request by Dainese S.p.A., Alpinestars S.p.A. and associated defendants to stay proceedings relating to EP 3 498 117 pending the outcome of EPO opposition proceedings, while continuing the proceedings in respect of EP 4 072 364, applying R. 295(d) RoP and Art. 43 UPCA.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Stay of proceedings at joint request of all parties under R. 295(d) RoP
- Partial stay in multi-patent proceedings
- Court's discretion versus party autonomy under Art. 43 UPCA
Documents
- 10BF310FEEB433E1B60BEDE5B7D1B7F2_en.pdf2025-06-02EN