View all cases
UPC APP 25415/2025
—·EP4201327: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryDocument Access (RoP262)
- Parties
- Division
- Milan CD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Packaging & Conveying
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 5, 2025
Decisions
- 2025-06-05Application RoP262A
Milan Central Division confidentiality order (R. 262A RoP) in Insulet Corporation v. EOFLOW Co., Ltd. costs proceedings (EP 4 201 327). Insulet requested confidentiality for attorney fees and expenses in connection with its PI application. The court held that legal costs and attorney fees are not generally confidential, but may qualify for protection under R. 262A if they specifically reveal the company's financial capacity, commercial strategy, or the importance it attaches to the patent. The exhibits were partially classified as confidential on that basis.
Legal issues:Confidentiality of legal costs under R. 262A RoPTrade secrets in cost context (EU Directive 2016/943)Protection of financial capacity and commercial strategy information
Documents
- BF3761EC52C75F77DC9691DFC5DD5767_en.pdf2025-06-05ENGLISH