UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 25532/2025

·EP2839403: SECURE ZONE FOR SECURE PURCHASES

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Simon Reuter
Division
Mannheim LD
Judges
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
First decided
Jun 5, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-06-05
    Generic application

    Mannheim Local Division dismissed defendants Samsung's requests to exclude claimant Fingon's reply submissions as an impermissible amendment of the case, and to extend the rejoinder deadline. The court held that Fingon's reference to additional Samsung Galaxy S25 devices and further Trusted Applications (TAs) did not constitute a case amendment under Rule 263 RoP as they were further illustrations of the same attacked functionality (Samsung Knox/TEE/TrustZone platform). The decision on whether to exclude the submissions was deferred to the panel after the oral hearing.

    Legal issues:Amendment of case under Rule 263 RoPScope of attacked embodiments in infringement proceedingsExtension of rejoinder deadlineExclusion of submissions under Rule 9.2 RoP
Documents
  • EA7D2A7CD1D120C978B58F6EA6D58A3B_en.pdf2025-06-05EN
Fingon LLC v Samsung Electronics GmbH — UPC APP 25532/2025 | UPClytics