- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- Samsung Electronics GmbHOperating co.
- Samsung Electronics France S.A.S.Operating co.
Representatives- Henrik Timmann-rospatt Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 5, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked |
At the UPC: Fingon LLC (8 cases)·Samsung Group (57 cases)
This dispute contains 3 other proceedings
4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 2412/2026·UPC CFI 1213/2026·UPC CFI 1214/2026·UPC CFI 847/2026
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
- 2025-06-05
Summary: Mannheim Local Division dismissed defendants Samsung's requests to exclude claimant Fingon's reply submissions as an impermissible amendment of the case, and to extend the rejoinder deadline. The court held that Fingon's reference to additional Samsung Galaxy S25 devices and further Trusted Applications (TAs) did not constitute a case amendment under Rule 263 RoP as they were further illustrations of the same attacked functionality (Samsung Knox/TEE/TrustZone platform). The decision on whether to exclude the submissions was deferred to the panel after the oral hearing.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Amendment of case under Rule 263 RoP
- Scope of attacked embodiments in infringement proceedings
- Extension of rejoinder deadline
- Exclusion of submissions under Rule 9.2 RoP
- EA7D2A7CD1D120C978B58F6EA6D58A3B_en.pdf2025-06-05EN