Overview · Filed: —
UPC_APP_283/2025
A HAND-HELD CLEANING APPLIANCE
Procedural & sub-applicationsOther ProceduralCourt of AppealGeneric application—
Parties
Claimants
- SharkNinja Europe Limited
- SharkNinja Germany GmbH
Reps: Wolrad Prinz zu Waldeck Und Pyrmont (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer); Kilian Seidel (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer)
Respondents
- Dyson Technology Limited
Reps: Constanze Krenz (DLA Piper); David Kleß (DLA Piper); Joschua Fiedler (DLA Piper)
Judges
- Rian KaldenPresiding judge, legally qualified judge
- Ingeborg SimonssonLegally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
- Patricia RombachLegally qualified judge
- Graham AshleyTechnically qualified judge
- Max TilmannTechnically qualified judge
Patents
- EP 2 043 492
CPC codes: A47L5/24, A47L9/322, A47L9/32, A47L9/22, A47L9/28, A47L9/2857, A47L9/2884, A47L9/16
Sector: Furniture & Household
Outcome
Dismissed
Filed: —
First decided: Jan 20, 2025
Language: —
Court of Appeal dismissed SharkNinja's application for suspension of cost-determination proceedings (R. 295(d) RoP) as inadmissible, because the one-month period for filing a cost-determination application (R. 151 RoP) starts from service of the merits decision, not from service of the preliminary injunction order. Since no merits decision had yet been issued, the application was premature. The court further noted that R. 150/151 RoP apply by analogy where no main proceedings are initiated after unsuccessful provisional measures.