View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche AGOperating co.
- Roche Diabetes Care GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Christof Augenstein-Kather Augenstein
- Sophie Prudent-Kather Augenstein
- Katharina Brandt-Kather Augenstein
- Thomas Kronbergersupporting-Grünecker Patent- und Rechtsanwälte PartGmbH
Respondents- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.Operating co.
- Tandem Diabetes Care Europe B.V.Operating co.
- VitalAire GmbHOperating co.
- Dinno Santé s.a.i.Operating co.
- Air Liquide Healthcare Nederland B.V.Operating co.
- Rubin Medical ApSOperating co.
Representatives- Roland Küppers-Taylor Wessing
- Alexander Rubusch-Taylor Wessing
- Christine Kanz-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Tung-Gia du-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Konstantin Schallmoser-Bonabry
- Charlotte Garnitsch-Taylor Wessing
- Wim Maas-Taylor Wessing
- Iris van der Heijdt-Taylor Wessing
- Pauline Springorum-Taylor Wessing
- Patrick van Ginneken-Algemeen Octrooi- en Merkenbureau B.V.
- Alexander Harguth-Bonabry
- Carl-Alexander Dinges-Bonabry
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- InstrumentsMeasurement · Medical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 30, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Roche Group (29 cases)·Tandem Diabetes Care Group (18 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 8 other proceedings
CC 20972/2024·CC 21542/2024·UPC CFI 504/2023·UPC APP 11294/2025·UPC APP 23079/2025 and 3 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-06-30
Summary: Procedural order from Düsseldorf Local Division in infringement proceedings concerning EP 1 970 677. Claimants are F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and Roche Diabetes Care GmbH; defendants include Tandem Diabetes Care entities, VitalAire GmbH, Dinno Santé, Air Liquide Healthcare Nederland, and Rubin Medical ApS. The order addresses a procedural matter (likely scheduling or written procedure), with no substantive ruling on infringement or validity.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Case management/procedural scheduling in infringement action
- Insulin pump / continuous glucose monitoring technology
Documents
- A293582597A3D1FA1CBD01459BB74AAF_de.pdf2025-06-30DE