UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 32887/2025

·EP4072364 +1 more: PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Document Access (RoP262)
Parties
Respondents
Reps: Gualtiero Dragotti; Constanze Krenz
Division
Milan LD
Judges
Technology
Automotive
Language
First decided
Aug 26, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-08-26
    Application RoP262A

    Final order from the Milan Local Division (UPC_CFI_472/2024) on Dainese's application under R. 262A RoP for confidentiality protection of financial exhibits filed in the context of a security for costs application by Alpinestars and Motocard. The Court granted the application in part, creating a confidential club including Defendants' General Counsel (Ms. Buccimazza) and their legal representatives, balancing protection of confidential financial data against the defendants' right to an effective defence.

    Legal issues:Confidentiality protection (R. 262A RoP)Security for costs proceedingsMinimum confidential club membership
Documents
  • 9EF098EF4292650048E306EFC02D04D0_en.pdf2025-08-26EN
Dainese S.p.A. v Alpinestars S.p.A. — UPC APP 32887/2025 | UPClytics