UPC Analytics
ENDE
Overview · Filed:

UPC_APP_32933/2025

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersMannheim LDProcedural Order
Parties

Claimants

  • Centripetal Limited
Reps: Ralph Nack (Noerr PartG mbB); Frank Meyer-Wildhagen (MFG Patentanwälte PartG mbB)

Respondents

  • Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Reps: Henrik Lehment (Hogan Lovells International LLP)
Judges
  • Peter TochtermannPresiding judge and judge-rapporteur
Patents
  • EP3281580
Outcome
Dismissed
Filed:
First decided: Jul 25, 2025
Language:

The Mannheim Local Division rejected Centripetal Limited's application for penalty payments against Palo Alto Networks for alleged non-compliance with the saisie (evidence preservation) order of 3 June 2025 (amended 9 July 2025) concerning EP 3 281 580. The Court found that Palo Alto was not obliged to provide access rights to its German branch office's sales-only staff beyond their ordinary duties, and was not required to bring hardware or increase employee access to the encrypted network security system. The premises to be inspected only contained sales and marketing personnel who had no access to the technical network system. Key holding: the inspection order does not compel a defendant to set up, bring or otherwise create access to items not ordinarily available at the inspected premises; it only requires passive toleration of inspection of what is already there.