- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Respondents
- NUC Electronics Co., LtdOperating co.
Representatives- Martin Momtschilow-Preu Bohlig & Partner
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Other fieldsConsumer products
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 4, 2025
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked |
At the UPC: Hurom Co., Ltd. (29 cases)·NUC Electronics Group (29 cases)
This dispute contains 11 other proceedings
UPC CFI 2303/2026·UPC CFI 2304/2026·UPC CFI 1999/2026·UPC CFI 1411/2026·UPC CFI 1412/2026 and 6 more
8 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 2003/2026·UPC CFI 1409/2026·UPC CFI 1410/2026·UPC CFI 1396/2025·UPC CoA 435/2025 and 3 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
- 2025-08-04
Summary: Mannheim Local Division extended the time period for NUC Electronics Co., Ltd. to comment on a penalty payment request by Hurom Co., Ltd. by two weeks (until 20 August 2025) in enforcement proceedings concerning EP 2 028 981. The full extension of three weeks requested by NUC was rejected. Defendant's vacation-related and logistical reasons were insufficient to justify the full extension. The extension of the comment period does not affect the defendant's obligation to provide information in due time, nor the amount of any potential penalty.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Extension of time period to comment on penalty payment request (R. 9.3(a) RoP)
- Penalty enforcement for failure to provide information (R. 354.4 RoP)
- Vacation period as basis for limited extension
- BDA44418B64683B44917EBB251364F4B_en.pdf2025-08-04EN