View all cases
UPC APP 47039/2024
—·EP2479680: Method for presenting rate-adaptive streams
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther Procedural
- Parties
- RespondentsReps: Tilman Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Conor McLaughlin
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Ingeborg Simonsson · Standing judge
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 21, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-08-21Generic application
The Court of Appeal's standing judge ruled that AYLO's submission under Rule 9.1 RoP was inadmissible as filed without leave, holding that Rule 9.1 does not confer a right to file unsolicited submissions, and only an application and response are permitted under Rule 220.4 RoP.
Legal issues:Procedural application Rule 9.1 RoPAdmissibility of unsolicited submissionsAppeal Rule 220.4 RoP
Documents
- 22AB32921D5EE2F521498A90094E66B1_de.pdf2024-08-21DE