UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 57474/2024

·EP3866051: MOBILE COMPUTER CONFIGURED TO READ MULTIPLE DECODABLE INDICIA

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Tobias Wuttke (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Johannes Bukow (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP); Tonio Allendorf (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Computing & AI
Language
First decided
Nov 1, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-11-01
    Generic application

    Court of Appeal (Judge-Rapporteur) refused Scandit's request for leave to file a reply to Hand Held Products' response to appeal pursuant to R. 36 RoP. The Court held that no further written exchange is provided for under the RoP unless a cross-appeal has been filed, and that the alleged new matter raised in the response to appeal did not justify an exception.

    Legal issues:Leave to file reply in appeal (R. 36 RoP)Written procedure in appealNo further exchange of submissions without cross-appeal
  • 2024-11-01
    Generic application

    German-language version of the same Court of Appeal procedural order (1 November 2024) refusing Scandit's request for leave to file a reply to Hand Held Products' response to appeal pursuant to R. 36 RoP in the preliminary injunction appeal proceedings.

    Legal issues:Leave to file reply in appeal (R. 36 RoP)Written procedure in appeal
Documents
  • Procedural%20ORDER_CoA_App_57474_2024%20HAND%20HELD%20Products%20v%20SCANDIT_2024_11_01_SIGNED%20EN%20%28002%29.pdf2024-11-01GERMAN
  • Procedural%20ORDER_CoA_App_57474_2024%20HAND%20HELD%20Products%20v%20SCANDIT_2024_11_01_SIGNED.pdf2024-11-01GERMAN