View all cases
UPC APP 5885/2025
EP4072364 Unitary patent +1 more · PROTECTIVE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING SAID PROTECTIVE DEVICE
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dainese S.p.A.Operating co.
Respondents- Alpinestars S.p.A.Operating co.
- Alpinestars Research S.p.A.Operating co.
- Omnia Retail S.r.l.Operating co.
- Horizon Moto 95 - Maxxess CergyOperating co.
- Zund.stoff AugsburgOperating co.
- MOTOCARD BIKE, S.L.Operating co.
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technology
- Mechanical engineeringTransport
- Other fieldsOther consumer goods
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Feb 7, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2022-06-08
- Alpinestars S.p.A.Admissible2024-10-03
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Milan LD | Locked |
| Judge Alima Zana | Locked |
| Judge Pierluigi Perrotti | Locked |
| Judge Anna-Lena Klein | Locked |
| Judge Graham Ashley | Locked |
At the UPC: Dainese S.p.A. (17 cases)·Alpinestars S.p.A. (14 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
This dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 97/2026·UPC CFI 1781/2026·UPC CoA 931/2025·UPC CFI 182/2025·UPC CFI 831/2024 and 11 more
Decisions
- 2025-02-07
Summary: The Milan Local Division granted Dainese S.p.A.'s application under R. 9 RoP to extend the deadline for filing its defence to counterclaims for revocation and reply to statements of defence, in light of a concurrent EPO oral hearing on 13 February 2025 for the parallel opposition proceedings, and invited the parties to submit a joint request for alignment of future procedural deadlines.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Deadline extension under R. 9 RoP
- Coordination of UPC proceedings with parallel EPO opposition proceedings
- Case management and alignment of procedural deadlines
Documents
- 1103DA41C0196A3EB3F37C586D90F76A_en.pdf2025-02-07EN