UPC APP 594339/2023

—·EP2568724: Radio Communication Device and Radio Communication Method

Case details: Status
—
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties: Claimants
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.
OROPE Germany GmbH
Reps: Rien Broekstra (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators); Andreas Kramer (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators)
Respondents
Panasonic Holdings Corporation
Reps: Miriam Kiefer (Kather Augenstein)
Division: Court of Appeal
Judges: Rian Kalden · Vorsitzende Richterin und rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
Ingeborg Simonsson · Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin und Berichterstatterin
Patricia Rombach · Rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
Technology: Telecommunications
Language: —
First decided: Dec 19, 2023

Decisions

2023-12-19
DismissedAppeal decisionApplication for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))
The Court of Appeal (Second Panel) rejected OPPO's request for shortening of the time period for lodging a Statement of Response in the appeal concerning the language of proceedings (EP 2 568 724, misidentified in the filing as EP 3 096 315). Same outcome and reasoning as App_594327/2023: request filed on last available day, insufficient time for respondent, contrary to principles of proportionality and fairness. Proceedings closed. This is the German-language version of the order.
Legal issues:Expedition of appeal proceedings (R. 225(e) RoP)Shortening of time period for Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP)Proportionality, fairness and due process in appeal proceedingsLanguage of proceedings dispute
2023-12-19
DismissedAppeal decisionApplication for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))
English translation of the Court of Appeal order (Second Panel) rejecting OPPO's request for shortening of the time period for the Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP) in the appeal concerning the language of proceedings for EP 2 568 724. Same reasoning as App_594327/2023. Proceedings closed.
Legal issues:Expedition of appeal proceedings (R. 225(e) RoP)Shortening of time period for Statement of Response (R. 9.3(b) RoP)Proportionality, fairness and due processLanguage of proceedings dispute

Documents