UPC_APP_594339/2023

Radio Communication Device and Radio Communication Method

AppealsMain AppealCourt of AppealApplication for an Order for expedition of an appeal (RoP225(e))—

Overview Decisions Citations Documents Timeline

Parties

Claimants

Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.(OPPO Group)(Xiaomi Group)
OROPE Germany GmbH(OPPO Group)(Xiaomi Group)

Reps: Rien Broekstra (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators); Andreas Kramer (Vossius & Brinkhof UPC Litigators)

Respondents

Panasonic Holdings Corporation(Panasonic Group)

Reps: Miriam Kiefer (Kather Augenstein Rechtsanwälte Part GmbB)

Judges

Rian KaldenVorsitzende Richterin und rechtlich qualifizierte Richterin
Ingeborg SimonssonRechtlich qualifizierte Richterin und Berichterstatterin
Patricia RombachRechtlich qualifizierte Richterin

Patents

EP 2 568 724SEP · LTE

CPC codes: H04W84/042, H04J11/0023, H04L5/0051, H04L5/0057, H04W72/23, H04W72/542, H04W72/0453, H04L5/0062, H04L5/005, H04L27/2662, H04L27/2657, H04L5/001…

Sector: Telecommunications

Outcome

Dismissed

Filed: —

First decided: Dec 19, 2023

Language: —

The Court of Appeal (Second Panel) rejected OPPO's request for shortening of the time period for lodging a Statement of Response in the appeal concerning the language of proceedings (EP 2 568 724, misidentified in the filing as EP 3 096 315). Same outcome and reasoning as App_594327/2023: request filed on last available day, insufficient time for respondent, contrary to principles of proportionality and fairness. Proceedings closed. This is the German-language version of the order.