UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 103/2025

Apr 29, 2025·EP2437696 · SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONTROLLING POSITION

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent revoked)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Audio-visual technology
  • Instruments
    Medical technology
Language
English
First decided
Mar 3, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • isarpatent - Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Behnisch Barth Charles Hassa Peckmann und Partner mbBWithdrawn2019-12-30
  • Philips International B.V.Admissible2020-01-03
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Stefan JohanssonLockedLocked
Judge Stefanie PhilippsLockedLocked

At the UPC: Philips Group (46 cases)·Advanced Brain Monitoring, Inc. (5 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-03-03
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Hague Local Division revoked Advanced Brain Monitoring's EP 2 437 696 B2 (position therapy device for sleep disorders) as lacking inventive step over JP748 prior art. The counterclaim for revocation by Philips succeeded and the infringement action was dismissed.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Revocation
    • Inventive step
    • Position therapy device
    • Sleep disorders
    • Counterclaim for revocation
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-03-03Not public
Decision2026-03-03Not public
Decision2026-03-03Public
Oral procedure opened2026-01-12Not public
Interim procedure closed2026-01-12Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-11Not public
Further pleadings2025-12-11Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-11Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-11Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-12-11Not public