UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 1940/2026

EP3689383 Unitary patent · CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTORS TARGETING B-CELL MATURATION ANTIGEN

Case details
Status
—
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Brussels LD
Technology
  • Chemistry
    Biotechnology · Pharmaceuticals
Language
—
First decided
Jun 8, 2026
Last decision
Jun 15, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • Boult Wade Tennant LLPAdmissible2025-12-31
  • Legend Biotech Ireland LimitedAdmissible2026-09-29
  • STRAWMAN LIMITEDAdmissible2026-09-29
  • Lang, SvenAdmissible2026-09-30
  • Keltie LLPAdmissible2026-09-30
  • Hampton Knowles LimitedAdmissible2026-09-30
  • Janssen Pharmaceutica NVAdmissible2026-09-30
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Brussels LD—Locked
Judge Samuel GranataLockedLocked
Judge Marije KnijffLockedLocked
Judge Anna-Lena KleinLockedLocked

At the UPC: Janssen Group (11 cases)·2seventy bio, Inc. (2 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-06-15
    Counterclaim for revocationPublic

    Summary: The Brussels Local Division issued a procedural order under R.37 RoP joining the infringement action and counterclaim for revocation to be heard jointly, and directed the Judge-Rapporteur to request allocation of a technically qualified judge to the panel. The Local Division Brussels will hear both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Joinder of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation under R.37 RoP
    • Allocation of technically qualified judge
    • Joint proceedings before Brussels Local Division
  • 2026-06-08
    Counterclaim for revocationPublic

    Summary: The Brussels Local Division issued a procedural order under R.37.2 RoP, announcing its intention to exercise discretion to hear the infringement action (UPC_CFI_029/2026) and the counterclaim for revocation (UPC_CFI_1934/2026 and UPC_CFI_1940/2026) jointly under Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA. The parties were given until 12 June 2026 to comment on this intended course of action, with silence treated as agreement.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • R.37.2 RoP - early procedural decision by order
    • Art. 33(3) UPCA - joint hearing of infringement action and counterclaim for revocation
    • Art. 33(3)(a) UPCA - discretion to hear infringement and revocation together
    • R.158 RoP - security for costs
Documents
  • ORD%28I%29_R37_UPC_CFI_029-1934_1940-2026_Signed.pdf2026-06-08EN
  • Procedural%20Order%20%28R.37%20RoP%29%20UPC_CFI_029-2026%20UPC_CFI_1934-2026%20UPC_CFI_1940-2026.pdf2026-06-15EN