UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 209/2026

·EP2593025: LAPAROSCOPIC MORCELLATOR

Case details
Status
Action
Infringement
Category
Main Infringement Action
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Carl-Alexander Dinges (Bonabry); Daniel Hoppe (Bonabry); Konstantin Schallmoser (Bonabry); Alexander Harguth (Bonabry)
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Judges
Technology
Pharmaceutical & Medical
Language
First decided
Jul 20, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-07-20
    Infringement

    The court ordered that the steps already taken to bring the Statement of Claim to the attention of Defendants 1 and 2 (who refused to accept documents served under the Hague Convention) constitute good service under R. 275.2 RoP. Service is deemed effective as of the date of this order (20 July 2026).

    Legal issues:Good service under R. 275.2 RoPService under The Hague Convention where recipient refuses to accept documentsAlternative method of service on Chinese defendants
Documents
  • 612ac8d3-b85f-4fe0-ad7b-084bea158a62.pdf2026-07-20EN