UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 2296/2025

Dec 31, 2025·EP1740740 · COMPACT SERVICE MODULE WHICH IS INTENDED FOR ELECTROLYTIC ALUMINIUM PRODUCTION PLANTS

Case details
Status
Interim Phase
Action
Revocation
Category
Main revocation action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
  • Konstantin Schallmoser
Division
Munich CD
Technology
  • Chemistry
    Surface technology, coating
Language
French
First decided
Mar 24, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Munich CDLockedLocked
Judge Mélanie BessaudLockedLocked
Judge András KupeczLockedLocked
Judge Koen CallewaertLockedLocked

At the UPC: REEL International (1 case)·Fives ECL, SAS (5 cases)

2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 42/2026·UPC CoA 30/2024

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich CD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-03-24
    Revocation ActionPublic

    Summary: The Munich section of the Central Division rejected Fives ECL's preliminary objection to jurisdiction in Reel International's revocation action against EP 1 740 740, holding that Rule 19.1 RdP's list of preliminary-objection grounds is exhaustive and does not extend to lack of legal interest to act or res judicata. It also rejected Fives ECL's alternative requests for an early ruling on those defenses (R. 361/362 RdP) and for an early hearing, deferring both to the merits decision, and exempted Reel International from translating English-language exhibits. Costs of the preliminary objection will be decided together with the decision on the merits.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • Rule 19.1 RdP preliminary-objection grounds are exhaustive and do not extend to lack of legal interest to act (intérêt à agir) or res judicata
    • res judicata effect of German national revocation proceedings on the German part of EP 1 740 740
    • standing under Art. 47(6) UPCA / Rule 44 RdP of a parent company not itself sued
    • timing of the merits hearing (RoP preamble point 7) relative to a pending Court of Appeal ruling on the scope of res judicata
    • translation exemption for English-language exhibits
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-10-15Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-15Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-10-15Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-10-15Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-10-15Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-10-15Not public
Submission Claimant2026-10-15Not public
Receipt2026-10-15Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-15Not public
Exhibit Defendant2026-10-15Not public