UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 336/2025

Apr 14, 2025·EP2028981 · JUICE EXTRACTOR

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Withdrawn)
Action
Generic
Category
Generic
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Mannheim LD
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
English
First decided
May 5, 2026
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Mannheim LDLocked
Judge Peter TochtermannLocked
Judge Dirk BöttcherLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLocked

At the UPC: Hurom Co., Ltd. (29 cases)·NUC Electronics Group (29 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-05-05

    Summary: The claimant withdrew its Application for a cost decision (filed following the Court of Appeal's dismissal of the underlying infringement action). The court permitted the withdrawal under R. 265 RoP applied by analogy, declared the proceedings closed, and found no basis to award costs for the cost proceedings themselves.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Withdrawal of application for cost decision under R. 265 RoP applied by analogy
    • Permissibility of withdrawal where no objection raised by defendants
    • Allocation of costs in cost-decision proceedings (R. 150 RoP)
    • Art. 69(3) UPCA exceptional costs for unnecessary proceedings
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-05-06Not public
Decision2026-05-05Not public
Decision2026-05-05Public
Communication2026-04-13Not public
Receipt2026-04-10Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-10Not public
Application document Claimant2026-04-10Not public
Communication2026-04-01Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-08-06Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-08-06Not public