UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 580/2025

Jun 27, 2025·EP2011218 · BOOST POWER FACTOR CORRECTION CIRCUIT (BOOST PFC)

Action number: ACT 30657/2025

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Withdrawn)
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy
Language
German
First decided
Aug 21, 2025
Last decision
Jul 14, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked
Judge Berenice ThomLockedLocked
Judge Peter AgergaardLockedLocked
Judge Ingo RinkenLockedLocked
Judge Ronny ThomasLockedLocked
Judge Ulrike VoßLockedLocked

At the UPC: Tridonic GmbH & Co KG (4 cases)·Inventronics GmbH (1 case)

2 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

CC 16360/2024·UPC CFI 459/2023

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-07-14
    Withdrawal (RoP265)Public

    Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division allowed the withdrawal of Tridonic's infringement action against Inventronics, filed after out-of-court settlement discussions, with the defendants' consent. The case value was reduced from EUR 1,000,000 to EUR 300,000, the claimant was ordered to bear the costs of the infringement proceedings, and a total of EUR 9,500 in court fees was to be reimbursed (50% of reduced court fees plus overpaid portion).

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Withdrawal of infringement action under R. 265 RoP
    • Reimbursement of court fees under R. 370.9(b) and R. 370.11 RoP (new version from 1 January 2026, 50% reimbursement)
    • Reduction of case value from EUR 1,000,000 to EUR 300,000 based on parties' uncontested submissions
    • Costs borne by withdrawing claimant under R. 265.2(c) RoP
  • 2025-08-21

    Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division granted a joint application by both parties to stay the infringement proceedings under R.295(d) and R.296.2 RoP pending ongoing settlement negotiations. The stay was granted until reinstitution of proceedings at the request of either party. This is the underlying infringement action UPC_CFI_580/2025 (Tridonic v. Inventronics).

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Stay of proceedings for settlement negotiations (R.295(d) RoP)
    • Joint application for stay
    • Conditions for reinstitution of stayed proceedings (R.296.2 RoP)
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-07-14Not public
Decision2026-07-14Not public
Decision2026-07-14Public
Communication2026-06-22Not public
Receipt2026-06-08Not public
Cover sheet2026-06-08Not public
Application document Claimant2026-06-08Not public
Communication2026-06-01Not public
Receipt2026-04-22Not public
Cover sheet2026-04-22Not public