UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 616/2025

Nov 6, 2025·EP2590626 · LIPOSOMES WITH LIPIDS HAVING AN ADVANTAGEOUS PKA-VALUE FOR RNA DELIVERY

Case details
Status
Deliberation Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Division
The Hague LD
Technology
  • Chemistry
    Biotechnology · Pharmaceuticals
Language
English
First decided
Feb 18, 2026
Last decision
Sep 14, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.Withdrawn2016-07-28
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
The Hague LDLockedLocked
Judge Edger BrinkmanLockedLocked
Judge Margot KokkeLockedLocked
Judge Stefan SchillingLockedLocked
Judge Martin SchmidtLockedLocked

At the UPC: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (20 cases)·Moderna Group (20 cases)

This dispute contains 1 other proceedings

UPC CFI 1439/2025

3 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 1509/2025·UPC CFI 1511/2025·UPC CFI 620/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: The Hague LD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-09-14
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: The Hague Local Division panel order (11 Sep 2026) in GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA v Moderna Netherlands B.V. and fourteen Moderna affiliates (EP 2 590 626; infringement action UPC_CFI_616/2025 and counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_1439/2025): after the oral hearing of 1 Sep 2026, the panel revokes under R. 335 RoP the judge-rapporteur's earlier rejection of GSK's late-filed 'New ATEM' cryo-TEM reports with stained RNA of the accused products, admits them, orders GSK to resubmit them with a 600-word explanation by 16 Sep 2026 and lets Moderna respond within one week; the target decision date is unaffected.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Revocation of a judge-rapporteur's case management order by the panel (R. 331.3, 334, 335 RoP)
    • Admission of late-filed evidence after the oral hearing; right to be heard (Art. 76(2) UPCA)
    • R. 114 RoP exceptional case
  • 2026-02-18
    Infringement ActionPublic

    Summary: The Hague Local Division ruled on GSK's application to amend its claim under Rule 263 RoP and Moderna's application to dismiss late-filed submissions under Rule 9 RoP in patent infringement proceedings relating to mRNA vaccine technology.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Amendment of claim Rule 263 RoP
    • Late-filed submissions Rule 9 RoP
    • mRNA vaccine patent
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2026-10-08Not public
Deliberation opened2026-10-08Not public
Receipt2026-09-23Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-23Not public
Document Defendant2026-09-23Not public
Receipt2026-09-16Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-16Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-09-16Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-09-16Not public
Exhibit Claimant2026-09-16Not public