UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 651/2025

EP2080349 · SHARING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT IN A PEER-TO-PEER CONFIGURATION

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent partly revoked)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Judges
—
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Sep 2, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC36% (45/125)146
Dusseldorf LDLockedLocked

At the UPC: Disney Group (33 cases)·InterDigital Group (38 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-09-02
    InfringementPublic

    Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division decision (Panel 1, 2 Sep 2026) on InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS's infringement action UPC_CFI_297/2025 and Disney's counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_651/2025 concerning EP 2 080 349 (sharing multimedia content in a peer-to-peer configuration; in force in Germany and the Netherlands): the patent is revoked to the extent of claims 1, 4 and 8, claim 1 only beyond the limited wording of auxiliary request K5, and the counterclaim is otherwise dismissed; on that amended claim 1 the eleven Disney defendants indirectly infringe by supplying the Disney+ streaming service and are ordered to refrain from supplying it in Germany and the Netherlands, to provide information and accounts, and are held jointly and severally liable for damages since 14 Dec 2011 (successively to Sony Ericsson, Sony Group and the claimant); a declaration of infringement is granted, the interim damages award is refused, no enforcement security is imposed; costs 90/10 (infringement) and 70/30 (counterclaim) against the defendants; value EUR 3m each, cost ceiling EUR 600,000.

    Show the legal issues (5)
    • indirect (contributory) infringement by supplying a streaming service as means relating to an essential element (Art. 26 UPCA)
    • partial revocation and maintenance of claim 1 in the wording of auxiliary request K5 (novelty, inventive step)
    • liability for damages of successive proprietors' losses since 2011 (Art. 68 UPCA)
    • no enforcement security under R. 118.8 RoP where the claimant is clearly solvent (contrast UPC_CFI_87/2025)
    • interim award of damages refused
Documents
  • 9d8974f5-2adf-4b51-addf-7f468e013dc8.pdf2026-09-02EN