UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 713/2025

·EP2345029: Method, computer program and device for decoding a digital audio signal

Case details
Status
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counter Claim for Revocation
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Volkmar Henke
Respondents
Reps: Oliver Bäcker
Division
Judges
Language
First decided
Jun 16, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-06-16
    Counterclaim for revocation

    Following an interim conference under R. 105.5 RoP, the judge-rapporteur set the value of the infringement action (UPC_CFI_301/2025) and the counterclaim (UPC_CFI_713/2025) each at 1.5 million euros, for a total of 3 million euros. The parties were ordered to submit a consolidated document of their respective requests and confirm their costs agreement by 30 June 2026.

    Legal issues:Case value determination (R. 104(i) RoP)Recoverable costs ceiling agreement (R. 104(j)(k) RoP)Oral hearing structure: order of validity vs. infringementConditional counterclaim for revocation (R. 263.3 RoP)Confidentiality of exhaustion and FRAND defence materialsClaim construction and prior art impact on infringement
Documents
  • ORDER%20R%20105.5%20ORANGE%20v%20HMD%20signedCL.pdf2026-06-16EN
Orange SA v HMD Global Oy — UPC CFI 713/2025 | UPClytics