UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 98/2025

Feb 10, 2025·EP2796333 +1 more: Speed detection system and compliance monitoring

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Costs Assessments
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Johannes Lang (Bardehle Pagenberg)
Respondents
Reps: Robin Hayes
Division
Paris CD
Technology
Automotive
Language
English
Decisions
  • 2025-04-29
    Costs onlyApplication For Costs

    Order of Central Division Paris Seat in BMW v ITCiCo Spain (EP 2 796 333) on an application for a costs decision. BMW (applicant/claimant in the revocation action, where a default judgment had revoked the patent) sought recovery of costs incurred in opposing ITCiCo's failed application to set aside the default judgment. The court held that an application to set aside a decision by default is an internal procedural remedy and does not independently give rise to costs: those costs may be claimed within the costs proceedings related to the underlying default judgment.

    Legal issues:Costs decision following application to set aside a default judgmentScope of costs associated with internal procedural remediesRevocation action – patent previously revoked by default judgment
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Application-For-Costs-Decision-Outcome2025-05-06Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-04-29Not public
cost decision2025-04-29Public
cost decision2025-04-29Public
rule 262A2025-03-12Public
Panel-Appointment2025-02-10Not public
Receipt2025-02-10Not public
Application Confidentiality R262A2025-02-10Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-10Not public
Exhibit BP03 confidential2025-02-10Not public
Exhibit BP03 confidential2025-02-10Not public
Application for cost decision2025-02-10Not public
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellscha… v ITCiCo Spain S.L. — UPC CFI 98/2025 | UPClytics