UPClytics
EnglishDeutsch
Sign inSign up
View all cases

UPC CoA 113/2026

Jul 7, 2026·EP3289139: TISSUE PAPER COMPRISING PULP FIBERS ORIGINATING FROM MISCANTHUS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME

Follow
Case details
Status
Deliberation Phase
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Furniture & Household
Language
English
First decided
Jul 27, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-07-27
    AppealPublic

    Summary: In a case management order on WEPA's appeal against the Hague Local Division's confirmation of an evidence-preservation order, the Court of Appeal held that the fixed fee for an appeal under R. 220.1(c) RoP concerning Art. 60 or 61 UPCA orders is EUR 5,000, and that no value-based fee arises because the anticipated first-instance value of EUR 400,000 is below the EUR 500,000 threshold. WEPA having paid EUR 14,600, the Registry was instructed to reimburse EUR 9,600.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • appeal court fees under R. 228 RoP and the Table of Court Fees
    • fixed fee for an appeal under R. 220.1(c) RoP concerning Art. 60/61 UPCA orders
    • value-based fee threshold and reimbursement of overpaid court fees
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.deliberationPhaseOpen2026-08-19Not public
action.phaseChange.oralPhaseClose2026-08-19Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-08-19Not public
Receipt2026-08-13Not public
Cover sheet2026-08-13Not public
Document2026-08-13Not public
action.communication.general2026-08-12Not public
Receipt2026-08-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-08-12Not public
Other document Appellant2026-08-12Not public
action.phaseChange.oralPhaseOpen2026-08-11Not public
action.phaseChange.writtenPhaseClose2026-08-11Not public
action.communication.general2026-08-11Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-08-10Not public
Order2026-08-10Public
Receipt2026-07-30Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-30Not public
Statement of Response2026-07-30Not public
action.summons.oralHearing2026-07-27Not public
Summons2026-07-27Public
action.publishOrderDecision.order2026-07-27Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-07-27Not public
Order2026-07-27Public
Receipt2026-07-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-24Not public
Document2026-07-24Not public
Receipt2026-07-24Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-24Not public
Submission Appellant2026-07-24Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-07-23Not public
Order2026-07-23Public
Order2026-07-23Public
action.communication.general2026-07-23Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-07-17Not public
Order2026-07-17Public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-07-16Not public
Receipt2026-07-07Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-07Not public
Fee2026-07-07Not public
Statement of Appeal2026-07-07Not public
Proof of payment2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Exhibit Appellant2026-07-07Not public
Other cases on the same patent
  • 2025-12-08UPC CFI 1898/2025WEPA NEDERLAND B.V. v Essity Hygiene and Health Aktiebolag

More cases: Court of Appeal·2026