UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 194/2025

Feb 28, 2025·EP4201327: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Ronald Mirko Weinert
Respondents
Reps: Marc Grunwald
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
  • Peter Blok · Legally qualified judge and standing judge
Technology
Packaging & Conveying
Language
English
First decided
Apr 3, 2025
Decisions
  • 2025-04-03
    WithdrawnApplication Rop 265

    Court of Appeal (standing judge Blok) order permitting EOFlow Co., Ltd.'s withdrawal of its application for leave to appeal against a Milan Central Division cost order and declaring the leave-to-appeal proceedings closed. EOFlow had sought leave to appeal against the dismissal of its cost application following Insulet's failed provisional measures request. Both parties agreed to the withdrawal and neither sought a costs decision for the leave-to-appeal proceedings.

    Legal issues:Withdrawal of leave-to-appeal application (R. 265 RoP)Cost decision in provisional measures proceedingsInsulin pump / wearable medical device technology
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-10-24Not public
Order closure2025-04-03Public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-04-03Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-04-03Not public
Order withdrawal2025-04-03Public
Response to EOFlow's Withdrawal of Leave to Appeal2025-03-20Not public
Preliminary order withdrawal2025-03-19Not public
Receipt2025-03-18Not public
250317_App.WithdrawAfLA_UPC_CoA_194_2025_signed2025-03-17Not public
Response to Appclication for Leave to Appeal2025-03-11Not public
Preliminary order leave2025-03-06Not public
Preliminary order leave2025-03-06Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-03-05Not public
Receipt2025-03-05Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-03-05Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-28Not public
250228_RoP221.1 and 221.4_UPC_CFI_380_20242025-02-28Not public