UPClytics
EnglishDeutsch
Sign inSign up
View all cases

UPC CoA 2/2026

Jan 5, 2026·EP4346690 +1 more: AUTOMATED MANAGEMENT OF CLINICAL MODIFICATIONS TO TREATMENT PLANS USING THREE-DIMENSIONAL CONTROLS

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Respondents
Reps: Felix Beck (Arnold Ruess)
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Technology
Healthcare Informatics
Language
English
First decided
Jan 6, 2026
Decisions
  • 2026-01-06
    DismissedAppeal decisionRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The standing judge of the Court of Appeal (Rian Kalden) dismissed Angelalign's request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) of the Düsseldorf Local Division's procedural order of 16 December 2025 (which had disregarded certain non-infringement arguments and an exhibit in the provisional measures proceedings concerning EP 4 346 690). The request was dismissed as Angelalign failed to provide sufficiently specific references to support its claim that the impugned order was 'manifestly erroneous'.

    Legal issues:Discretionary review of procedural order (R. 220.3 RoP)Manifestly erroneous standard for reviewSufficiency of grounds in request for reviewDisregarding late submissions in provisional measures proceedings
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2026-01-07Not public
action.issueOrder.order2026-01-06Not public
Order2026-01-06Public
action.publishOrderDecision.case2026-01-06Not public
Receipt2026-01-06Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-06Not public
Other document Appellant2026-01-06Not public
Further pleadings2026-01-06Not public
Formal Deficiency found2026-01-06Not public
Receipt2026-01-05Not public
Cover sheet2026-01-05Not public
Fee2026-01-05Not public
Statement of appeal and statement of the grounds of appeal2026-01-05Not public