UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 380/2025

Apr 28, 2025·EP3223320: LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Generic
Category
Main Appeal
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Dirk Jestaedt (KRIEGER MES Partnerschaft mbB)
Respondents
Reps: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP)
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
Semiconductor Devices
Language
German
Decisions
  • 2025-08-20
    Application to leave to appeal a cost decision (RoP221)

    Court of Appeal dismissed an application for leave to appeal against a cost decision (R.221 RoP) and refused requests to refer questions to the CJEU for preliminary rulings under Art. 267 TFEU. The Court clarified that while it must interpret its own law consistently with EU law, it cannot ask the CJEU to interpret the UPCA or the RoP directly.

    Legal issues:Application for leave to appeal cost decision (R.221 RoP)CJEU preliminary ruling referral under Art. 267 TFEUScope of UPC's obligation to apply EU lawInterpretation of UPCA and RoP
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
action.phaseChange.caseClose2025-09-29Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-08-20Not public
Anordnung2025-08-20Public
Receipt2025-05-23Not public
Schriftsatz2025-05-23Not public
Stellungnahme2025-05-15Not public
Anordnung2025-05-09Not public
Panel-Appointment2025-04-30Not public
Receipt2025-04-30Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-04-30Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-28Not public
Berufung2025-04-28Not public