UPC CoA 430/2025
May 15, 2025·EP2787541 · Solar cell
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain appeal
- Parties
- Claimants
- Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Phillip Rektorschek-PENTARC Rechtsanwälte PartGmbB
- Jan Phillip Rektorschek-Taylor Wessing
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringSemiconductors
- Language
- English
- First decided
- May 20, 2025
- Last decision
- Jul 9, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- CARBONAdmissible2023-05-31
- SEMCO SMARTECH FRANCEAdmissible2023-05-31
- Astronergy Europe GmbH2024-09-24
- Astronergy Solar Netherlands B.V.Intervention2024-11-08
- CHINT New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.Intervention2024-11-27
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Klaus Grabinski | Locked |
| Judge Peter Blok | Locked |
| Judge Emmanuel Gougé | Locked |
At the UPC: Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (10 cases)·JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. (10 cases)
This dispute contains 3 other proceedings
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Court of Appeal·2025
- 2025-07-09Appeal RoP220.2Public
Summary: The Court of Appeal ordered Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. to provide security for costs of EUR 200,000 in an infringement appeal after finding that Chint, a Chinese company, failed to demonstrate sufficient financial means. The Court upheld an appeal against the Munich Local Division's partial refusal to order the other five defendants to provide security, confirming the original grant of security against Chint while declining to extend it to the other co-defendants.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Security for costs under Rule 158 RoP
- Financial means of foreign claimant
- Differentiated security orders for multiple defendants
- 2025-05-20
Summary: Court of Appeal order on CHINT's application for suspensive effect of a first-instance order and expedition of appeal proceedings. JingAo had obtained an order from Munich Local Division requiring CHINT (and five other defendants) to provide security for costs of EUR 200,000. CHINT appealed and sought suspension of the security obligation and expedited review. The order addresses the conditions for granting suspensive effect and expedited proceedings on appeal.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Suspensive effect on appeal (R. 220.2 RoP)
- Security for costs (R. 158 RoP)
- Expedition of appeal proceedings
- Solar cell patent infringement
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2025-07-10 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-07-09 | Not public |
| DecisionOutcome | 2025-07-09 | Not public |
| Final order | 2025-07-09 | Public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-07-01 | Not public |
| Hearing reference | 2025-07-01 | Not public |
| Interim-Procedure-Closure | 2025-06-11 | Not public |
| Summon-Oral-Hearing | 2025-06-11 | Not public |
| Procedural order oral hearing | 2025-06-11 | Public |
| Procedural order oral hearing | 2025-06-11 | Public |