UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 44/2026

Mar 19, 2026·EP3281569 +2 more · MODULAR FOAM UNIT

Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Other fields
    Consumer products
Language
German
First decided
Mar 24, 2026
EPO Opposition
  • Koninklijke Douwe Egberts B.V.Admissible2019-04-04
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Ulrike VoßLocked
Judge Bart van den BroekLocked
Judge Nathalie SabotierLocked
Judge Uwe AusfelderLocked
Judge Ulrike HolzLocked

At the UPC: Alpina Coffee Systems GmbH (10 cases)·CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG (10 cases)

Decisions
  • 2026-03-24
    Application RoP 223Public

    Summary: Order of the Court of Appeal (single judge) on an application for suspensive effect (Rule 223 RoP) filed by ALPINA Coffee Systems GmbH in its appeal against a Düsseldorf Local Division decision largely upholding CUP&CINO's infringement claim for EP 3 398 487 (milk frother). The Court of Appeal addressed the admissibility and merits of the suspensive effect application. The underlying first-instance decision had found infringement of EP 3 398 487 and rejected the revocation counterclaim. No final ruling on suspensive effect is visible from the excerpt; the order concerns procedural steps and assessment of the application.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Application for suspensive effect of appeal under Rule 223 RoP
    • Assessment of obvious errors in first-instance decision
    • Infringement of patent on milk frother
    • Revocation counterclaim
Document titleDatePublic
Receipt2026-10-19Not public
Cover sheet2026-10-19Not public
Exhibit Respondent2026-10-19Not public
Statement of Response2026-10-19Not public
Order2026-07-22Not public
Order2026-07-22Public
Order2026-07-22Public
Receipt2026-07-18Not public
Cover sheet2026-07-18Not public
Receipt2026-07-18Not public