UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CoA 486/2023

Dec 29, 2023

Follow
Case details
Status
Case Closed
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Judges
Language
German
First decided
Jan 11, 2024
Last decision
Mar 21, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked

At the UPC: Netgear Group (20 cases)·Huawei Group (62 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2023

Decisions
  • 2024-03-21
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public

    Summary: Order of the Court of Appeal (Panel 2) on a request for discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP. The appeal arose from a preliminary objection ruling in Huawei v. Netgear. The Court of Appeal laid down important procedural headnotes: (1) case management decisions of the judge-rapporteur cannot be directly appealed but must first be reviewed by the panel under Rule 333.1 RoP; (2) the judge-rapporteur's decision to deal with the preliminary objection in the main proceedings is such a case management decision; (3) rejection of a preliminary objection may be appealed with leave under Rule 220.2 RoP, optionally bypassing the panel review. The Court addressed the admissibility and scope of discretionary review.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Admissibility of direct appeal against case management decisions
    • Panel review under Rule 333.1 RoP as prerequisite to appeal
    • Discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP
    • Preliminary objection procedure
  • 2024-01-11
    Application RoP 333Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal standing judge (11 January 2024) allowed Netgear's request for discretionary review, permitting Netgear to appeal the CFI judge-rapporteur's order of 11 December 2023, holding that the JR could not himself decide on the admissibility of a R. 333 review application of his own decision. The case was referred to the President of the CoA for assignment to a panel.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Discretionary review (R. 220.3 / R. 333 RoP)
    • Admissibility of R. 333 application
    • Judge-rapporteur competence
    • Case management decision
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Headnote-and-Keyword-Translated2025-06-12Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-24Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-02-21Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2025-02-14Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-05-30Not public
Vermerk2024-03-27Not public
Anordnung vom 21. März 20242024-03-21Public
Anordnung vom 21. März 20242024-03-21Not public
Anordnung vom 21. März 20242024-03-21Not public
Hearing Reference2024-02-21Not public
Hearing Reference2024-02-21Not public
Hinweis auf Terminsverfügung im separaten Workflow2024-01-26Not public
summons2024-01-26Not public
Ladung zum Termin Hinweise Videokonferenz2024-01-26Public
24-01-23_-_STN_ORD_3293_2024_-_UPC_CoA_486_2023_-_EP_989_-_Huawei_v_Netgear_signed.pdf2024-01-23Not public
24-01-23_-_STN_ORD_3293_2024_-_UPC_CoA_486_2023_-_EP_989_-_Huawei_v_Netgear_signed.pdf2024-01-23Not public
24-01-23_-_STN_ORD_3293_2024_-_UPC_CoA_486_2023_-_EP_989_-_Huawei_v_Netgear_signed.pdf2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Stellungnahme mündliche Verhandlung2024-01-23Not public
Verfahrensanordnung 19.01.20242024-01-19Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-01-12Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-01-12Not public
Rule 220.3 final order standing judge2024-01-12Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme R.220.32024-01-04Not public
K232024-01-04Not public
Stellungnahme zu R.220.32024-01-04Not public
Rule 264 order2023-12-29Not public
Panel-Appointment2023-12-29Not public
Anlagenkonvolut FBD 35 - Einspruch2023-12-22Not public
23-12-22_-_Antrag_nach_Regel_220.3_VerfO_EPG_betreffend_Abweisung_Regel_333_Antrag_signed.pdf2023-12-22Not public
Anlage FBD 37 - Zahlungsnachweis 595643_20232023-12-22Not public
23-12-22_-_Antrag_nach_Regel_220.3_VerfO_EPG_betreffend_Abweisung_Regel_333_Antrag_signed.pdf2023-12-22Not public
Anlage FBD 34 - Antrag vom 14. November 20232023-12-22Not public
Anlage FBD 33 - Decision on Preliminary Objection2023-12-22Not public