UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 622/2025

Jul 3, 2025·EP2778423 · Centrifugal pump assembly

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent partly revoked)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Mechanical engineering
    Engines, pumps, turbines
Language
German
First decided
May 27, 2026
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Steven KitchenLocked
Judge Uwe AusfelderLocked

At the UPC: Hefei Xinhu Canned Motor Pump Co., Ltd. (6 cases)·Grundfos Holding A/S (7 cases)

This dispute contains 5 other proceedings

UPC CoA 623/2025·UPC CFI 426/2025·CC 26515/2024·UPC CFI 11/2024·UPC APP 8530/2025

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 835/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-05-27
    Appeal RoP220.2Public

    Summary: The Court of Appeal (UPC) reversed the Düsseldorf Local Division's first-instance decision, partially revoking EP 2 778 423 (claims 1–3, 5, and 11, to the extent not dependent on surviving claims) for lack of inventive step over prior art D5 combined with general technical knowledge, while maintaining claims 4, 6, 7, 9, and 10. As a consequence, the infringement action by Grundfos against Hefei was dismissed in full because the infringement allegations were based solely on the revoked claims and non-patentable auxiliary requests.

    Show the legal issues (9)
    • New submissions on appeal (R. 222.2 RoP) — admissibility threshold
    • Claim construction — distinction between 'Umschalten' (switching) and 'Zuschalten' (adding) external speed control
    • Claim construction — primacy of language of proceedings (German) over English translation (Art. 70(1) EPC)
    • Claim construction — consistent interpretation of identical terms across claim features
    • Lack of inventive step of claim 1 over DE 101 39 510 A1 (D5) combined with general technical knowledge
    • Admissibility of new prior-art combinations raised in nullity counterclaim on appeal
    • Validity of dependent claims 2–3, 5–11 and auxiliary requests
    • Dismissal of infringement action following partial revocation of patent
    • Refusal to stay proceedings pending separate nullity action
Document titleDatePublic
Case closed2026-05-27Not public
Decision2026-05-27Not public
Decision2026-05-27Not public
Decision2026-05-27Public
Communication2026-05-26Not public
Receipt2026-03-12Not public
Cover sheet2026-03-12Not public
Document Respondent2026-03-12Not public
Oral procedure closed2026-02-26Not public
Hearing recording reference document2026-02-26Not public